AYESHA RASCOE, HOST:

Folks use hair relaxers for a lot of causes – for day-to-day comfort or simply actually liking the best way it appears. However final 12 months, one in all our company cautioned in opposition to utilizing hair relaxers and chemical straighteners.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED NPR BROADCAST)

ALEXANDRA WHITE: Frequent customers of the hair-straightening merchandise – that they had about over double the danger of uterine most cancers in comparison with ladies who didn’t say they’d used these merchandise.

RASCOE: And now the Meals and Drug Administration is proposing to ban hair relaxers containing a chemical known as formaldehyde, which is a identified carcinogen. Kimberly Bertrand is an affiliate professor of medication at Boston College College of Medication. She joins us now for extra. Welcome to this system.

KIMBERLY BERTRAND: Thanks. Joyful to be right here.

RASCOE: So what can we find out about this proposed ban by the FDA?

BERTRAND: Yeah. So the FDA has proposed a ban particularly proscribing a particular ingredient known as formaldehyde that is been utilized in some hair relaxers and different hair merchandise. Formaldehyde is a identified human carcinogen, which means it has been categorised as a cancer-causing agent. And the chemical can also have short-term results when inhaled – irritation of the eyes, nostril, pores and skin, and throat. It will probably exacerbate bronchial asthma, may cause hassle respiratory. So along with most cancers, there’s different considerations about this explicit chemical. The attention-grabbing factor is that the FDA’s centered particularly on formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasing merchandise, however that does not essentially cowl different potential poisonous elements which might be included or current in chemical hair relaxers.

RASCOE: What else is in there that is likely to be deemed dangerous?

BERTRAND: So it is actually tough to know, in some methods, as a result of the entire totally different firms, their formulations for these merchandise are proprietary. So you do not essentially know the extent of every little thing that is in there. However off-the-shelf testing has demonstrated that these merchandise comprise issues like heavy metals, which might accumulate within the physique over time, and so they can act each as carcinogens and have estrogen-like results. After which the opposite ones that we’re significantly involved about are chemical compounds referred to as endocrine disruptors, and these are chemical compounds that may both mimic estrogen or have anti-estrogen properties within the physique. And so for any kind of hormonally pushed most cancers, like uterine most cancers and breast most cancers and ovarian most cancers, these are the chemical class that we’re kind of most involved about.

So typically you will see on the label chemical – lengthy chemical names that finish within the phrase paraben, and typically you will see different lengthy chemical names that finish within the phrase phthalate, otherwise you would possibly see an abbreviation like DEP, which stands for diethyl phthalate. The difficulty is that, you understand, whereas some producers might checklist these elements, they don’t seem to be truly required to checklist them particularly, and these chemical compounds might solely be listed on the label as perfume or preservatives. So it may be actually exhausting to know what you are getting once you’re, you understand, choosing up these merchandise. After which when you are going to the salon, you actually don’t know.

RASCOE: Is proposing a ban on utilizing formaldehyde as an ingredient in hair relaxers sufficient?

BERTRAND: I believe a ban on formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasing merchandise may have a extremely vital impact on the well being of customers and salon staff, for instance, who might breathe in these merchandise after they’re launched into the air.

RASCOE: You will have stated that the – {that a} transfer to ban formaldehyde in hair relaxers is an environmental justice problem. What do you imply by that?

BERTRAND: These merchandise are closely marketed to Black ladies particularly. They’re utilized by Black ladies orders of magnitude greater than amongst white ladies, for instance. On the similar time, we additionally know that there are vital racial disparities in most cancers outcomes for Black ladies in comparison with white ladies on this nation. Black ladies usually tend to die from breast most cancers than white ladies. They’re extra prone to die from uterine most cancers than white ladies. And so we’re coping with this racial disparity in illness, and but we even have this publicity that’s predominantly skilled by Black ladies. The truth that we’ve this chemical publicity that hasn’t been strictly regulated is probably an vital consider these disparities.

RASCOE: Kimberly Bertrand is an affiliate professor of medication at Boston College College of Medication. Thanks a lot for becoming a member of us.

BERTRAND: Thanks, Ayesha.

Copyright © 2023 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional data.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This textual content might not be in its last type and could also be up to date or revised sooner or later. Accuracy and availability might range. The authoritative file of NPR’s programming is the audio file.