
[ad_1]
That’s the query posed by a paper by Wang, Sreedhara and Schneeweiss (2022). The authors replicate the findings from n=250 real-world information research. The research have been replicated utilizing 3 datasets: (i) Optum Clinformatics claims information, (ii) IBM MarketScan Analysis Database claims information, Medicare fee-for-service claims information, and (iii) CPRD digital well being information. Key paper findings are under:
Unique and copy impact sizes have been positively correlated (Pearson’s correlation = 0.85), a powerful relationship with some room for enchancment. The median and interquartile vary for the relative magnitude of impact (e.g., hazard ratiooriginal/ hazard ratioreproduction) is 1.0 [0.9, 1.1], vary [0.3, 2.1]. Whereas the vast majority of outcomes are intently reproduced, a subset are usually not. The latter might be defined by incomplete reporting and up to date information. Larger methodological transparency aligned with new steerage could additional enhance reproducibility and validity evaluation, thus facilitating evidence-based decision-making

This paper gained the 2023 Award for Excellence in Well being Economics and Outcomes Analysis Methodology. You’ll be able to learn the total paper right here.
[ad_2]